Founding families get a free diagnostic assessment. Join the waitlist →

Coming soon to OttawaFrançais

On a paper island, a girl explains the sum in her notebook to her smiling mentor, whose laptop shows her path of skills as a line of dots, beside an easel map of a winding path with the first steps done in gold.

Technology

Technology that knows where your child is. Mentors who know who they are.

Your child’s mentor works with the Hikmah platform. It tracks every skill against the Ontario curriculum, finds each gap and prepares the practice, so the mentor’s time goes to your child.

The Hikmah platform is in development. This page shows how it is designed to work.

At a glance

It does the tracking. The mentor does the teaching.

A tool for the mentor, built so your child’s next step is never a guess. Here is what it does, and what it never does.

For your child

  • The right next skill

    Short practice matched to their mastery map, a few minutes at a time.

  • Hints, not answers

    When they’re stuck, a question that points the way.

  • Progress they can see

    A ring fills as each skill becomes secure.

For the mentor

  • A mastery map for every child

    Every skill, mapped to the Ontario curriculum and kept current.

  • Gaps traced to the root

    A missed question points back to the earlier skill to check.

  • Return visits, scheduled

    Mastered skills come back weeks later, so they last.

It never

  • Replaces your child’s mentor
  • Gives your child an answer to copy
  • Changes a plan without a mentor’s review
  • Sells your child’s data or uses it for advertising
  • Ranks children against each other

A person always has the last word.

Our design commitments for the platform, which is in development.

How it connects

One system, built around one child.

Each part feeds the next, with the mentor in the middle. Select a part to see what it does.

Mastery map

Every skill and the skills beneath it, kept current for your child.

Takes in
The diagnostic, then every check
Passes on
What to practise next

Mastery map and root-cause loop

Find the gap. Fix the root.

The map links every skill to the skills beneath it. When one wobbles, it shows which earlier skill to check.

  • Mapped to the Ontario curriculum

    Lined up with what your child is taught at school.

  • Personal to your child

    Built from their diagnostic and every check since.

  • Always current

    It changes as your child learns.

Why trace back

Early skills predict later ones: in large U.S. and U.K. studies, fractions and division in elementary school predicted high school algebra five or six years later.

Siegler and colleagues (2012) (opens in a new tab)

Maya · Mastery graph
Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Place valueAdding and subtractingMultiplication factsWhat division meansMeasuringFractions as partsMulti-digit multiplicationEquivalent fractionsDecimals to tenthsArea and perimeterLong divisionAdding decimalsComparing fractionsVolumeAdding unlike fractions92%74%41%

Root found

Multiplication facts

Grade 3

What her mentor does nextThree short lessons on the 6, 7 and 8 times tables, with patterns she can see, then a fresh check.

MasteredWorking onGap foundTraced back to the rootSelect any skillIllustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

Then the loop fixes it, and makes it stick.

Why a loop

Using frequent checks to adjust the teaching is linked to substantial learning gains.

Black and Wiliam (1998) (opens in a new tab)Kulik, Kulik and Bangert-Drowns (1990) (opens in a new tab)

Check

A short mastery check.

An example

Ben, Grade 6, misses two questions on adding fractions with unlike denominators.

Illustrative example.

Practice

Short practice, in the order that makes it last.

The platform prepares your child’s practice in four moves, each drawn from research on how memory works.

A worked example first.

A new kind of problem starts with the thinking shown step by step, so your child sees how before trying alone.

Why it works

Worked examples help most early on; as skill grows, the support should fade.

Atkinson and colleagues (2000) (opens in a new tab)Kalyuga and colleagues (2003) (opens in a new tab)

Their turn, with a hint if needed.

Your child solves a similar problem and says how. If they’re stuck, the hint is a question, not the answer.

Why it works

Explaining their reasoning helped learners across 64 studies, and feedback that carries more information, about the task, how to do it and how to check yourself, helps most.

Bisra and colleagues (2018) (opens in a new tab)Wisniewski, Zierer and Hattie (2020) (opens in a new tab)

Mixed practice, once it’s secure.

New and older problem types are shuffled together, so your child learns to choose the method, not just repeat it.

Why it works

In 54 Grade 7 math classes, mixed practice led to 61% on a surprise test a month later, against 38%.

Rohrer and colleagues (2020) (opens in a new tab)

Return visits, weeks later.

Mastered skills come back as quick recall questions, further apart each time, so they hold until the next grade needs them.

Why it works

Spread-out practice lasts longer than cramming, and recalling beats rereading.

Cepeda and colleagues (2006) (opens in a new tab)Roediger and Karpicke (2006) (opens in a new tab)

Illustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

Four views, one child

Everyone sees what they need.

Step 1 of 19

Choose anything with a number, or take the guided tour.

Maya · Grade 5

12 min today

Fractions on a number line

Question 1 of 3

Where does 3/4 go?

Tap where it goes on the line.

Today’s session

  1. Warm-up3 min
  2. Number line6 min
  3. Mastery check4 min
  4. Project time15 min

Mastery

62%

Fractions on a line

3/6 in a row

Mastery check after six in a row

Up next

Comparing fractions

Your project

Market day budget

Price list due Friday

Step 2 of 4

Illustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

Short lessons, then real work.

What you’re looking at

AI with care

An AI that asks, not one that answers for them.

Your child learns to use AI well, with guardrails, once they can do the thinking themselves. Here is the same question, two ways.

Illustrative screen. The Hikmah platform is in development.

What the research found

In a field experiment with nearly a thousand high school students, those who practised math with an unrestricted AI chatbot did better during practice but 17% worse on the exam once it was taken away than students who never had it. A version built to give hints instead of answers largely avoided that harm.

Bastani and colleagues (2025) (opens in a new tab)

Our commitments

  • Mentors decide

    They review every plan and can override any suggestion.

  • Children do the thinking

    Our tools give hints and questions, not answers.

  • Checked first

    Generated questions are checked against the curriculum before your child sees them.

Our design commitments for the platform.

Privacy by design

Your child’s data, kept small and kept safe.

We collect only what learning needs, and you can see or delete it at any time.

  1. Collect little

    Only what learning needs: answers, progress and the mentor’s notes.

  2. Use for learning

    To teach your child and improve how we teach. Nothing else.

  3. Open to you

    Ask to see everything we hold about your child.

  4. Deleted on time

    Ask, and your personal information is deleted sooner. Within 12 months after you leave, it’s removed anyway. Either way, only anonymous data stays.

Never

  • Sold
  • Used for advertising
  • Published in a way that identifies a child

Sources

The research on this page. Read it for yourself.

Each study cited above, with a link to the original. These are other researchers’ findings, not results from Hikmah, which isn’t open yet.

  1. Siegler and colleagues (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement (opens in a new tab) Psychological Science.

  2. Black and Wiliam (1998). Assessment and classroom learning (opens in a new tab) Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

  3. Kulik, Kulik and Bangert-Drowns (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis (opens in a new tab) Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 265–299.

  4. Atkinson and colleagues (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research (opens in a new tab) Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.

  5. Kalyuga and colleagues (2003). The expertise reversal effect (opens in a new tab) Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31.

  6. Bisra and colleagues (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis (opens in a new tab) Educational Psychology Review.

  7. Wisniewski, Zierer and Hattie (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research (opens in a new tab) Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087.

  8. Rohrer and colleagues (2020). A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice (opens in a new tab) Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 40–52.

  9. Cepeda and colleagues (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis (opens in a new tab) Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.

  10. Roediger and Karpicke (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention (opens in a new tab) Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.

  11. Bastani and colleagues (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics (opens in a new tab) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), e2422633122.

What we’ll measure, and publish

  • How often the map’s first guess about a gap is right
  • How long each skill takes to master
  • What still holds at return visits
  • When AI helps a child think, and when it thinks for them

Every child deserves to be known. Let’s start with yours.

Come and meet us. Founding families get a free diagnostic assessment that shows exactly where your child is, before you decide anything.